Thursday, October 31, 2019

Puzzles Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Puzzles - Essay Example elieved that Pythagoras used anagrams to determine philosophical meanings, while Plato believed that anagrams revealed divinity and destiny (Anagrams FAQ). The Romans believed that anagrams actually had mystical and prophetic meanings (Wikipedia). In spite of their popularity in ancient times, anagrams seemed to disappear until the middle ages when Jewish mystics called Cabbalists believed that reciting letters from the Hebrew alphabet in various orders could work miracles and create humans from dust (Sydney Morning Herald). In 17th Century France, Louis the XIII appointed a Royal Anagrammist to whom he paid a reportedly exorbitant salary. By 1988, the first stand-alone anagram generating software was produced underscoring a fascination with this puzzle form that has existed for several thousand years. (Sydney Morning Herald). Throughout history, anagrams have gone in and out of popularity, and they have been used in several applications in addition to providing entertainment for puzzle solvers. Authors have used anagrams of their own names to create pseudonyms for their writing. Writers have also been known to use anagrams of actual people as the names of unpleasant characters. In addition to literature, anagrams have appeared in song lyrics. Jim Morrison used an anagram of his own name, â€Å"Mr. Mojo Risin† in the song â€Å"L.A. Woman.† Other songwriters have used anagrams for titles of songs of for band names. Galileo and other scientists used anagrams to protect their discoveries from being claimed by others. Cryptic crossword puzzles use anagrams as clues to add another dimension to crossword puzzles. (Wikipedia). Before the advent of computers, anagrams were created using pen and paper or letter tiles. Individual words have been anagrammed as well as entire sentences. With the creation of computer programs for anagramming, not only are there more possibilities for the numbers and kinds of anagrams that can be created, but also the games that can be played

Tuesday, October 29, 2019

Impact Technology Has on Small Businesses Essay Example for Free

Impact Technology Has on Small Businesses Essay Technology has given the world a 360 degrees turn, as well as all businesses. Technology has a great impact on our society, culture, businesses and education. This essay will not only prove why it has an impact on small businesses but also prove how it makes technology so much better and efficient. | The Impact Technology has on Businesses The impact that technology can make on a small business is huge. Technology has made the world a more efficient and more organized place to succeed, and can help a small business be a big success and accomplishment. By making a website for your business, you can help the business expand by selling products through the website, by doing this you expand the business world wide and can increase profit. You can also organize your business in all aspect, simple tasks made in a business such as book keeping and record keeping can make so much simpler by using technology. Technology is not just computers but is phones also, which is an essential for any business to have. With technology small businesses can become world-wide businesses and exceed the main purpose and achievement of the owner. To begin with, technology has made businesses grow. By using computers to achieve simple task as book keeping can make the job easier and keep all papers organized. Computers can help perform many tasks that offices have to do, like book keeping. Microsoft excel can help you perform this task in one single page without confusions and with less work than by paper. This is because excel can perform calculations for you once you adapt it, it is as simple as that. You can perform book keeping, record keeping, and perform all kind of calculations fast, understandable and visible in a single page. Now a day, you can have your meetings with business partners who are around the world in front of your computer! You can use Phones which are also a part of technology, and without them you can’t make orders for your business, or talk to others business people who can help you make your business grow while making you grow as an owner and entrepreneur also. Productivity can also improve in so many ways by using technology. Technology is exciting and can make things happen in a blink of an eye, work can be so much easier for employees. For example, now supermarkets have advance machines in order to ring the customer’s supplies, if an error occurs the employee can easily delete it instead of ringing everything up again. Without the advance technology we have today, the employees would have to put all prices by hand meaning they have to memorize all prices and if an error occurs, they will have to ring everything up again in order for the total to be correct. Also by having meetings done at that instant online you can save all the time of flying across the world to meet with a business partner, so whatever was in concern can be fixed and finish what you have to do, meaning more progress and productivity. By producing a website for your business can you can help it grow and expand your business to many other countries and produce more profit. By making a website many more people can see what your business bring to the world and have to offer. While a website is world-wide, your customers are world-wide, meaning more goods and services the business provide will be obtained and sold. If you sell your merchandize through the web you can perform a test and see how many states and countries, would like to have one of your businesses around based on the location wants and needs and construct the business in that specific location. For that fact, that the owner can make the business grow in difference ways, he/she can grow as an entrepreneur also. Finally with technology, you can produce more profit. By using technology in several ways you can increase the income of the business. Obviously, if you can produce and sell more not only in your location of business but in the web and around the world in which you will expand your business to, you will sell and increase profit. The entrepreneur’s income will increase and his success will exceed what was thought to be achieved. Anyone can be an entrepreneur but only the ones who force themselves to do better, can achieve excellence. I think that to install various businesses is not what makes an entrepreneur is how you keep those business stabilize and running is what makes a great entrepreneur. Technology doesn’t have to be imported into the business, business can be technology. There are many businesses in which technology is the main purpose, some businesses produce and sell technology, all kinds and types of it. From computers to printers to phones, not only phones but smart phones and templates which can be made into computers, mp3 and iPod. These are gadgets that are nothing without technology; technology is what brings all these gadgets to live. Some businesses cannot produce without technology if you think of it. For example, supermarkets, when you go pay at the registers, most supermarkets are now complete made of technology, the weigh in order to know the prices of fruits and vegetables are connected to the computer which transfer the weight and gives you a price, the screen you look at to keep in check the prices, that’s connected to the same monitor and it all combines to the register. When you are ready to pay and it’s with your credit card, you pass it through a machine which is connected to all and the internet to get an approval. This all needs technology to function. Matthew Hohn said â€Å"Together with the advancement of science and technology, technological innovations grew along with it, resulting to the emergence of new equipment and gadgets. No matter how big or small your company is, technology brings both intangible and tangible benefits to become cost efficient and to meet the growing demands and needs of customers† in the article. I agree with him in every aspect, technology has advance the way to look into our world and experiences, and by connecting businesses with technology and the way it can change the whole business completely is incredible. It’s truly amazing how technology has changed our world in many different ways and completely. In conclusion, technology has gave business the chance to expand and grow in many ways, by increasing profit, increasing chances of making a being a better one and achieving all the success it thought it will. With technology small businesses can become a world-wide business which will exceed achievement. By becoming world-wide the business will exceed the main purpose and achievement of the owner. Technology can go a really long way especially when it’s combined with business and greatness.

Sunday, October 27, 2019

Abortion pro life vs pro choice

Abortion pro life vs pro choice Pro-life vs. pro-choice is a nasty debate that doesnt seem to have many answers. There are many questions and facts to back up both sides of the argument. Some people say abortion is a womens rights issue. Other people say its an issue of morality, and still others an issue of just being right. The issue of abortion rights is an opinionated controversy in public life. Every person has an opinion about abortion rights, and it seems that a moral objective has become divided into two different arenas-social issues vs. religious issues, with the Church and the politicians in the direct line of fire. On one side of the abortion rights debate are the pro-life proponents. In the United States, the position of most Christian churches is that the Church has something to say about public life and the good society. The primary involvement of the U.S. Catholic bishops in public life in the last decade focused on abortion. The movement is not flexible, and while the movement recognizes that some women might not be ready to become mothers, pro-life supporters offer women a chance to give up their babies or offer support services. The pro-life movement is simple: abortion is murder and murder is bad. Pro-lifers measure life as beginning at the moment of conception. Anything which may disrupt a pregnancy (including birth control) is wrong. On the surface, the pro-life movement seems to impact the reproductive rights of women-because it does. While Roe vs. Wade 1973 allows women the right to choose to have elective abortions, pro-life supporters believe that the law abortion 3 should stop this from happening. Pro-lifers believe that all abortions are wrong and that every baby should have a chance to be born. The pro-life movement gave rise in the sixties. The proponents maintain that the fetus is alive and human. They believe that the unborn fetus is a person and physically independent, and as a person, the fetus has human rights. Pro-life believers agree that killing an unborn fetus is murder. There appears to be a competition between the U.S. Catholic and American politics. The bishops describe abortion and euthanasia as pre-eminent threats to human dignity because they directly attack life itself. The bishops declare that killing an unborn child is evil and to make such an evil action legal is wrong. Their opposition to legal abortion is the primary social issue. The Churchs teaching that direct abortion is morally wrong has become a tradition in the Church itself-the Church teaches that abortion is not only morally wrong, it is murder. Pro-lifers argue for the rights of unborn fetuses. Catholic moral teaching is based on the dignity of the human person, and the principles based on this foundation of human dignity apply across the board to all life issues. Abortion is now the fundamental human rights issue of today. The outcome of the debate between pro-choice and pro-life opponents needs to be politically correct and morally right. Pro-life and pro-choice are terms of political framing. The Catholic Church does not give women a personal choice in the abortion issue. Abortion is murder and pro-life is anti-abortion. The end abortion 4 result could possibly be that the U.S. bishops and the American politicians will both win their side of the controversy at hand: the social issue and the religious issue of abortion rights will not be morally right, and abortion will not be legal. In the argument for pro-choice, those who want women to have the choice whether or not to have an abortion, the debate does not discuss whether life begins at fertilization. The argument in pro-choice is not necessarily that all women should HAVE abortions, but that women should have the CHOICE whether or not to have one. Pro-choice is a middle ground; anti-choice is forced motherhood. Pro-choice supporters believe abortion should be settled privately between a woman and her doctor. Pro-choice is not pro-abortion. Supporters include those who are personally against abortion, but who do not impose their viewpoint on all women. The pro-choice movement does not advocate abortion over birth-it simply defends the right of women to decide for themselves. The pro-choice believers support and work towards preventing unwanted pregnancies, reducing abortion, promoting contraception, educating women and youth, and ensuring that families have the necessary resources to raise healthy happy children. Abortion clinics and hospitals follow proper protocol for abortion. These clinics must provide full information on the risks and side effects and procedures. They must allow a woman to view the embryo, inform her if there are twins, and provide fetal development photos. All women are counseled on birth control, and counselors offer non-judgmental options to the women. abortion 5 Most women have already made up their minds to have abortions when they visit an abortion clinic, yet 1 to 5% change their minds after counseling. Clinic counselors clear up womens anxieties and fears about abortion. An abortion clinic counselor saves far more unborn babies in a year than an anti-abortion picketer saves in a lifetime. The pro-choice movement and abortion providers are in the business of protecting and respecting womens rights, their moral autonomy, and their choices. They want every woman to be willing and every child to be wanted. Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-family, and pro-life in the true sense of that term. The movement struggles alone in efforts to decrease the need for abortions. Anti-choice opposes contraception and sexual education-a possible return to illegal unsafe abortions. Legal safe abortion is a matter of fundamental rights for women BECAUSE LAWS AGAINST ABORTION DONT STOP ABORTION. Pro-choice supporters do not want to debate with those who wish to strip women of their rights. In my opinion, the moral issue has been transferred from Church to state. Pro-life is a struggle between what is politically correct and morality. Both the pro-life and pro-choice movements have become a moral and political debate between the Church and the lawmakers and work toward their own desires and goals. The Catholic Church says that killing an unborn child is evil and to make such abortion 6 an action legal is wrong. The Church interprets abortion as killing and teaches that killing is a mortal sin. I question where the interpretation comes from: the Bible? The Ten Commandments? The Vatican? The Church thinks that abortion is a threat to human dignity because it directly attacks life itself. The moral issue of abortion becomes a social issue because of the Churchs opposition to legal abortion. They are saying that the act of making an abortion legal is wrong. Its almost like blaming the lawmakers for the sin of abortion. Then, they want the law to enforce their teachings. The abortion issue is not whether a woman is committing a sin by having an abortion, its who is legally responsible for her decision and the outcome. A woman should have the rightful freedom to believe what she wants to believe, and her sin (if it is a sin), is between her and God-not the Church, and not the law. The Church does not give women a personal choice in the abortion choice, therefore, they are taking away their fundamental human rights. I am not going to debate whether pro-life issues are correct or false, but rather, try to understand what pro-life is, what it means, and why its still being argued as the right way. On the other hand, the pro-choice movement is an ethical view that women should have the choice to continue or terminate a pregnancy. If abortion is not legal, women will return to illegal unsafe abortions. I believer that a woman should have the RIGHT to choose what to do with her body, and at the same time, I support the teachings of the Catholic Church that abortion is morally wrong. Abortion is a moral choice for any woman wishing to abortion 7 control her body-and this should be a certain unalienable right. If I were attempting to exercise my right of choice to have or not have an abortion, I would need to ask myself the following questions: -Is the fetus alive? Of course. Its a biological mechanism-a genesis of new life. But it does not have human rights-including the right to be aborted during its gestation. -Is it human? Yes-a human being in an early stage of development-not with full human rights. -Is it a person? No-just a potential person. -Is it physically independent? No-absolutely dependent on another human being for its continued existence. -Does it have human rights? Yes and no. Not before birth. -Is abortion murder? No-its not an independent person. While I support the teachings of the Church, I believe that a women should have the right to choose what to do with her body. The pro-choice movement wants every woman to be willing and every child to be wanted. Pro-woman, pro-child, pro-family, and pro-life in the true sense of that term. No one has the right answer, but no one has the wrong answer either. Although the woman always has the right to choose, the pro-life movement makes some good points any scared and single mother might want to consider. As for my feelings, I believe that abortion is a private issue-an issue that abortion 8 should be between a woman and God. I believe the Churchs teaching that God gave me free will to make my own decisions. I think that the pro-choice movement struggles alone in its efforts to decrease the need for abortion. Legal safe abortion is a matter of fundamental rights for women because LAWS AGAINST ABORTION DONT STOP ABORTION. Pro-life vs. pro-choice is a vicious debate that doesnt seem to have many answers. Some people say abortion is a womens rights issue. Other people say its an issue of morality, and still other an issue of just being right. abortion 9

Friday, October 25, 2019

Slavery :: Slavery Essays

Thesis: Slaves managed to be the main beneficiaries of a movement so entirely unintended for them because, in a series of coincidences brought about by certain effects of Northern progress and improvement, the promotion of their interests became profitable to to the concerns of other classes. Counter-argument: some might argue that slaves could not have been the primary beneficiaries of the progress and improvement taking place in the North in 19th century america b/c there were very few slaves in the north; they were primarily concentrated in the south which was little affected by these changes and with slaves being so remote from the situation, how could they have benefited from it? --while the south obviously did not experience the level of transformation that the north and midwestern regions underwent, it did not go untouched by this era of change--it apparently made southerners even more sealed in their determination to "preserve their way of life based on slavery,"as evidenced by their attempt to secede from the Union. Merely the fact that they reacted so strongly to the changes they perceived in the North indicates the force of the effect that progress had on them. --the very fact that there were few slaves in the north and so many in the south only contributed to the progress-fueled growing distinction between the North and South, the former of whom could not understand--likely because there were so few slaves in the North--the "semifeudal economic and social system" to which the South was "hopelessly attached" due to their dependence on slavery (p. 5, Sheriff). Point: Wage laborers necessary to the realization of improvements in the 19th century began to be perceived as a morally inferior permanent underclass--this elicited fears & changes in opinion involving progress--some (i.e. Bethel society) began to think that one man's (the businessman's) profit came at another's (the worker's) expense--brought about increasing desire for moral reform--leading to 2nd Great Awakening--which in turn led to popularity of abolitionist sentiment. Point: Decreasing reliance on slavery as a necessity to the maintenance of a stable economy, coupled with the still-strong Revolutionary ideals of liberty & equality, drew attention to injustices inherent in slavery. --slaves were necessary before because men were trying to produce huge quantities to ship over to England, at first to pay back their joint-stock companies and then to secure their stability in the "New World." but in the 19th century people were settled into their ways of life, and farmers did not feel such urgency to overproduce.

Thursday, October 24, 2019

PH lab report

Background information/Research PH paper (litmus paper) determines how acidic or how basic a substance is. The ape changes color accordingly to color code on the pH scale. The pH scale starts from O to 14. The lower the number the more acidic it is. Zero is the most acidic, and 14 is the most bas c while 7 is the neutral number for example water. Examples of an acid Is lemon Juice or multi p repose cleaner. Examples of a basic substance Is shampoo or liquid soap. We use pH for the products we use and food that we eat to check if it is safe to use for us humans and not harm us.With PH. Products have become safer and less harmful to our environment and ourselves. Materials Various indicators BRB blue Phew red Met red Methyl blue Met orange Methyl yellow Various unknowns Watch trays Procedures 1. Take 6 indicators that are all different colors. 2. Take the 4 unknowns numbered 14 3. Take a watch tray and wash it down before using it. 4. Put the indicator that Is numbered 1 in 6 slots on the watch tray. (Only put in one d rope) 5. Take each Indicator and put It in 1 slot each, each slot should have a different Indict taro color. (Again only one drop) .Record results and observations down on a table. Observe If It changed color, If It c hanged from 7. Wash down the watch tray again so you do not mix chemicals, or else your data will be inaccurate. 8. Repeat steps 47 for the last 3 unknowns. Results After the LAB I had various different results for each indicator reaction to the unknown All together I had 24 results, 6 results for each unknown. A couple of the indicators re acted to the unknown differently than the others. They started to change one color, then a bit late r it would change to a different color.

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Doll’s House Essay

According to Merriam-Webster, humanism is a philosophy that usually rejects supernaturalism and stresses an individual’s dignity and worth and capacity for self-realization through reason. Humanism is not just about males or just about females; its about humans living as one. In Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House, humanism is shown through every single word and every single detail. A Doll’s House centers on humanism because it demonstrates the search for identity, living up to societal standards, and believing that men and women are equal. Throughout the entire play, each character searches for their true identity. First by her father then by Torvald, Nora is treated like a doll her entire life. She does not know how to live any other way. All the men in her life treat her as a porcelain figurine as if she did not know any better. On page 181, Nora quotes, â€Å"When I lived with Papa, he used to tell me what he thought about everything, so I never had any opinions but his. And if I did have any of my own, I kept them quiet, because he wouldn’t have liked them. He called me his little doll, and he played with me just the way I played with my dolls. Then I came here to the live in your house–† In this quote, Nora describes to Torvald how she never had no say in her life; she always was someone’s shadow. Once she decides to leave Torvald, she has found her true identity. She decides to become an independent women and try to figure life out on her own. Nora isn’t the only character that is on a search for their true identity though. Krogstad is decried as morally corrupt by many of the characters. And yet this fellow Krogstad has been sitting at home all these years poisoning his children with his lies and pretenses†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Krogstad, a single father, forged a document and got caught in his act. At the end of the play, the readers find out that Mrs. Linde and Krogstad had a relationship a while back in the life. Mrs. Linde proposed the option of them getting married, for financial reasons. Krogstad loves the idea and seems like he has never been this happy before. It turns out that Krogstad just never wanted to be lonely and just wanted a partner. Seeking to find identity is what all human beings go through to find out who we, as a person, really are. Humanism also involves living up to societal expectations. Even in that time period, the characters experience different situations that anyone in this time period could go through as well. Torvald, being the man of the marriage and the father, has to take care of his whole family. Torvald did face many struggles, but one thing he did not do is show weakness. Because of society’s standards, showing weakness as a man was wrong. As read on page 185 Torvald says, â€Å"†¦Nora! Nora! †¦ Empty! She’s gone! †¦ The miracle of miracles–? † This quote shows that Torvald is a little broken-hearted about Nora’s decision to leave but we does not do anything about it. He just watches Nora slam the door behind him. Torvald could not change to be the man Nora wanted. Society’s expectations also put a lot of pressure on the citizens to gain money. Just because of money, Nora and Krogstad both break the law by forging a document. Plus Nora went behind her husband’s back just to gain a few extra bucks along the way. Also because of financial reasons, Mrs. Linde left Krogstad to be with a wealthier man to support her family. It seems like money revolves around everyone in this play. Money was the common goal that all citizens, male or female, required in their life to make it function properly. Living up to society’s expectations can lead to someone having troubles in their life, even in the 1800’s. One very important factor in humanism is equality. In the late 1800’s, there were absolutely no equal rights between men and women. Ibsen shows through his writings that regardless the gender, all should be equal. Ibsen gave Nora the role almost as if she was a man. On page 148, Nora tells Mrs. Linde, â€Å"Whenever Torvald gave me money to buy myself new clothes, I never used more that half of it; and I always bought what was cheapest and plainest†¦Ã¢â‚¬  In this quote Nora explains that she saves up some money, without Torvald knowing. Nora took roles that helped out her family financially. This is odd because in that time period, that was the men’s job. Nora almost disobeyed her role as a women to have a men’s role in life. Ibsen gave Nora this role to show that females were capable of making money and supporting their family. While the women knew this, the men of that time period thought the opposite. Also Ibsen stressed that women are females too. He showed through the text that females were capable of getting a job and making the money, just like the males. Even Mrs. Linde got a job of her own that replaced a male. Ibsen strongly believes that both men and women should be equally viewed, no matter what time period. In Henrik Ibsen’s play A Doll’s House, he portrays humanism on the next level. A Doll’s House and humanism are connected by the search for identity, the society’s standards, and the fact that both men and women deserve to be equal. Everyone has a different view on what Ibsen thoughts were when he was writing this play. Behind every word he wrote, there was a moral that Ibsen tried to get the reader to understand. Even when human rights were frowned upon, Ibsen knew that change needed to be done and equality needed to happen.